਍㰀猀琀礀氀攀 琀礀瀀攀㴀∀琀攀砀琀⼀挀猀猀∀㸀ഀഀ .BODY { background-color: #EAF1F7; background-image: url('images/gtbh.jpg'); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: fixed; background-position: center; color: #0066CC;} ਍⸀䌀㄀笀琀攀砀琀ⴀ愀氀椀最渀㨀 樀甀猀琀椀昀礀㬀挀漀氀漀爀㨀 ⌀  㘀㘀䌀䌀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ猀椀稀攀㨀 匀䴀䄀䰀䰀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ昀愀洀椀氀礀㨀 吀愀栀漀洀愀㬀紀ഀഀ .BIB{text-align: center;color: #000099;FONT-size: SMALL;FONT-family: Tahoma;} ਍⸀䌀伀一吀笀琀攀砀琀ⴀ愀氀椀最渀㨀 爀椀最栀琀㬀挀漀氀漀爀㨀 ⌀䘀䘀    㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ猀椀稀攀㨀 匀䴀䄀䰀䰀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ昀愀洀椀氀礀㨀 吀愀栀漀洀愀㬀紀ഀഀ ਍㰀䴀䔀吀䄀 栀琀琀瀀ⴀ攀焀甀椀瘀㴀∀挀漀渀琀攀渀琀ⴀ琀礀瀀攀∀ 挀漀渀琀攀渀琀㴀∀琀攀砀琀⼀栀琀洀氀㬀 挀栀愀爀猀攀琀㴀唀吀䘀ⴀ㠀∀㸀㰀⼀䠀䔀䄀䐀㸀ഀഀ ਍㰀䘀伀一吀 䄀䰀䤀䜀一㴀∀䨀唀匀吀䤀䘀夀∀ 䘀䄀䌀䔀㴀∀吀愀栀漀洀愀∀㸀ഀഀ

ARŪṚ SIṄGH, SARDĀR BAHĀDUR SIR (1865-1926), sarbarāh (manager) of the principal Sikh shrines at Amritsar and Tarn Tāran from 1907 to 1920, much maligned for his role during the popular movement for reform in the management of Sikh shrines, came of a well-known Shergil family of Naushahrā in Amritsar district, also called Naushahrā Naṅglī, to distinguish it from another village sharing the same name, Naushahrā Pannūāṅ, in the same district. His grandfather, Jassā Siṅgh, had been for two years in charge of the Golden Temple under Lahiṇā Siṅgh Majīṭhīā. Arūṛ Siṅgh was hardly four years old when his father, Harnām Siṅgh, a deputy superintendent of police, died in 1868. Brought up under a court of wards and educated at Government High School, Amritsar, Arūṛ Siṅgh came into full possession of his family estate in 1885. In 1888, he was made an honorary magistrate class II, with powers over 133 villages of Kathū Naṅgal police circle. In 1907 he was made magistrate class I and a provincial darbārī (courtier), and was also appointed by government sarbarāh in spite of the reformers' demand that the right to appoint the sarbarāh should vest in the Sikh community itself. It was bruited about that Arūṛ Siṅgh had set apart for certain British officers valuable presents from the toshākhānā (treasury) of the Darbār Sāhib. An agitation was set afoot against him on this account. However, it came to nothing; likewise, later complaints laid against him of mismanagement and corruption in the gurdwārās under his charge were rejected.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀吀栀椀渀最猀 挀愀洀攀 琀漀 愀 栀攀愀搀 眀栀攀渀 䄀爀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀☀⌀㜀㜀㜀㄀ 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 愀渀搀 琀栀攀 瀀爀椀攀猀琀猀 漀昀 匀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 䐀愀爀戀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀 匀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀栀椀戀 瀀甀戀氀椀挀氀礀 栀漀渀漀甀爀攀搀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 䐀礀攀爀Ⰰ 爀攀猀瀀漀渀猀椀戀氀攀 昀漀爀 䨀愀氀氀椀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀瘀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀氀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 䈀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀㰀甀㸀最栀㰀⼀甀㸀 洀愀猀猀愀挀爀攀 椀渀 ㄀㤀㄀㤀⸀ 䐀攀洀愀渀搀 昀漀爀 栀椀猀 爀攀洀漀瘀愀氀 愀猀 㰀椀㸀猀愀爀戀愀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀栀 㰀⼀椀㸀最愀琀栀攀爀攀搀 洀漀洀攀渀琀甀洀 搀愀礀 戀礀 搀愀礀⸀ 唀氀琀椀洀愀琀攀氀礀Ⰰ 䄀爀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀☀⌀㜀㜀㜀㄀ 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 戀漀眀攀搀 琀漀 琀栀攀 瀀漀瀀甀氀愀爀 眀椀氀氀⸀ 䠀攀 渀漀琀 漀渀氀礀 爀攀猀椀最渀攀搀 琀栀攀 漀昀昀椀挀攀 漀昀 㰀椀㸀猀愀爀戀愀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀栀㰀⼀椀㸀 戀甀琀 愀氀猀漀 琀攀渀搀攀爀攀搀 愀琀 愀 洀攀攀琀椀渀最 愀琀 䨀愀氀氀椀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀瘀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀氀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 䈀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀㰀甀㸀最栀㰀⼀甀㸀 猀漀洀攀琀椀洀攀 搀甀爀椀渀最 䄀甀最甀猀琀 ㄀㤀㈀  愀 瀀甀戀氀椀挀 愀瀀漀氀漀最礀 昀漀爀 栀椀猀 愀挀琀猀 漀昀 漀洀椀猀猀椀漀渀 愀渀搀 挀漀洀洀椀猀猀椀漀渀 爀攀氀愀琀椀渀最 琀漀 琀栀攀 洀愀渀愀最攀洀攀渀琀 漀昀 琀栀攀 猀栀爀椀渀攀猀 甀渀搀攀爀 栀椀猀 挀栀愀爀最攀⸀ 吀栀攀 最漀瘀攀爀渀洀攀渀琀Ⰰ 栀漀眀攀瘀攀爀Ⰰ 椀渀 瘀椀攀眀 漀昀 栀椀猀 氀漀礀愀氀 猀攀爀瘀椀挀攀猀Ⰰ 挀漀渀昀攀爀爀攀搀 漀渀 栀椀洀 愀 欀渀椀最栀琀栀漀漀搀 漀渀 琀栀攀 一攀眀 夀攀愀爀 䐀愀礀 漀昀 ㄀㤀㈀㄀⸀ 䠀攀 栀愀搀 愀氀爀攀愀搀礀 戀攀攀渀 愀眀愀爀搀攀搀 愀 䌀⸀ 䤀⸀ 䔀⸀ ⠀䌀漀洀瀀愀渀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 䤀渀搀椀愀渀 䔀洀瀀椀爀攀⤀ 椀渀 ㄀㤀㄀㌀㬀 栀攀 渀漀眀 戀攀挀愀洀攀 匀愀爀搀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀 匀椀爀 䄀爀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀☀⌀㜀㜀㜀㄀ 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀Ⰰ 䬀⸀ 䌀⸀ 䤀⸀ 䔀⸀ ⠀䬀渀椀最栀琀 䌀漀洀瀀愀渀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 䤀渀搀椀愀渀 䔀洀瀀椀爀攀⤀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ

        Arūṛ Siṅgh died in 1926.

਍㰀⼀昀漀渀琀㸀ഀഀ

਍䈀䤀䈀䰀䤀伀䜀刀䄀倀䠀夀㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀㰀漀氀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 䜀爀椀昀昀椀渀Ⰰ 䰀攀瀀攀氀Ⰰ 愀渀搀 䌀⸀ 䘀⸀ 䴀愀猀猀礀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀䌀栀椀攀昀猀 愀渀搀 䘀愀洀椀氀椀攀猀 漀昀 一漀琀攀 椀渀 琀栀攀 倀甀渀樀愀戀㰀⼀椀㸀⸀ 䰀愀栀漀爀攀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㐀 㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ

  • Mohinder Singh, The Akali Movement. Delhi, 1978
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 䐀礀攀爀Ⰰ 刀⸀ 䔀⸀ 䠀⸀ Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀䐀椀猀琀甀爀戀愀渀挀攀猀 椀渀 琀栀攀 倀甀渀樀愀戀㰀⼀椀㸀⸀ 䰀漀渀搀漀渀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㈀ 㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ
  • Pratāp Siṅgh, Giānī, Gurdwārā Sudhār arthāt Akālī Lahir. Amritsar, 1975
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 䨀漀猀栀Ⰰ 匀漀栀愀渀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀䄀欀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀氀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 䴀漀爀挀栀椀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀 搀愀 䤀琀椀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀猀㰀⼀椀㸀⸀ 䐀攀氀栀椀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㜀㈀㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ

    Ian J. Kerr


    ਍㰀⼀昀漀渀琀㸀ഀഀ ਍㰀⼀䠀吀䴀䰀㸀㰀⼀䈀伀䐀夀㸀ഀഀ